Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Question

  1. #1
    DemocraticWarrior Battle Lord rightiswrong's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    In a euphoric state.
    Posts
    7,659
    Thanks
    7,267
    Thanked 2,052 Times in 1,314 Posts

    Question

    Does the Constitution guarantee or preclude the right to own arms?
    Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a night.
    Set a man on fire and he'll be warm the rest of his life.


  2. #2
    DemocraticWarrior Battle Lord Icky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    On Cloud Nine!
    Posts
    22,640
    Thanks
    3,531
    Thanked 4,060 Times in 2,508 Posts

    Re: Question

    [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

    Click here to enlargeprevent: keep from happening or arising; make impossible

    [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

    Click here to enlargegive surety or assume responsibility

    Constitution:
    There are several versions of the text of the Second Amendment, each with slight capitalization and punctuation differences, found in the official documents surrounding the adoption of the Bill of Rights.[Only registered and activated users can see links. ] One such version was passed by the [Only registered and activated users can see links. ], which reads:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
    “ A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. ” Another version is found in the copies distributed to the [Only registered and activated users can see links. ], and then ratified by them, which had this capitalization and punctuation:[Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
    “ A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. ” The original hand-written copy of the Bill of Rights, approved by the House and Senate, was prepared by [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] and resides in the [Only registered and activated users can see links. ].
    Sounds like a guarantee to me but you how "Lawyerese" can be... Click here to enlarge
    Click here to enlargeIf you could reason with religious people there'd be no religious people. -House
    A couple of years ago, a Republican committee staff director told me candidly (and proudly) what the method was to all this obstruction and disruption. Should Republicans succeed in obstructing the Senate from doing its job, it would further lower Congress’s generic favorability rating among the American people. By sabotaging the reputation of an institution of government, the party that is programmatically against government would come out the relative winner.
    -Mike Lofgren, 28 years as a staffer on the Republican House and Senate budget and other committees, often dealing with national security and defense issues

  3. #3
    DemocraticWarrior Battle Lord rightiswrong's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    In a euphoric state.
    Posts
    7,659
    Thanks
    7,267
    Thanked 2,052 Times in 1,314 Posts

    Re: Question

    So what you are saying is that the Constitution's purpose is too guarantee the implicit rights of the people not to impede them. Interesting, that was my thinking also.

    So why all the noise about gay marriage, can't have it both ways.

    The answer is simple.
    Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a night.
    Set a man on fire and he'll be warm the rest of his life.


  4. #4
    DemocraticWarrior Battle Lord Icky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    On Cloud Nine!
    Posts
    22,640
    Thanks
    3,531
    Thanked 4,060 Times in 2,508 Posts

    Re: Question

    Seems simple to me, too.

    Perhaps Dr.S or Sejanus can chime in on this...
    Click here to enlargeIf you could reason with religious people there'd be no religious people. -House
    A couple of years ago, a Republican committee staff director told me candidly (and proudly) what the method was to all this obstruction and disruption. Should Republicans succeed in obstructing the Senate from doing its job, it would further lower Congress’s generic favorability rating among the American people. By sabotaging the reputation of an institution of government, the party that is programmatically against government would come out the relative winner.
    -Mike Lofgren, 28 years as a staffer on the Republican House and Senate budget and other committees, often dealing with national security and defense issues

  5. #5
    DemocraticWarrior Battle Lord
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    6,511
    Thanks
    3,020
    Thanked 1,007 Times in 650 Posts

    Re: Question

    I answered this question in one of the gun threads. The Constitution does not give absolute rights to anyone. Citizens forfeit their rights to own a gun when they break the law and are convicted, so the 2nd Amendment does not give an absolute right as a blanket amendment for gun ownership.

    They can't even get gay marriages approved in the most liberal state in the country, California.
    The individual states are allowed to pass legislation for their state according to the 10th Amendment-
    The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States, respectively, or to the people.
    Simple
    Iraq - Another Bright Shining Lie

  6. #6
    Democratic Warrior ChiffonBreath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    2,055
    Thanks
    781
    Thanked 600 Times in 430 Posts

    Re: Question

    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by rightiswrong Click here to enlarge
    Does the Constitution guarantee or preclude the right to own arms?

    No. The Bill of Rights and Amendments give us rights.

    The strict Constitutionalists want to take all of our rights away..right's that were hard fought for...plenty of blood shed to prove it.
    Click here to enlarge

  7. #7
    Fascism Fighter Supreme martsmart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    California
    Posts
    1,752
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked 54 Times in 39 Posts

    Re: Question

    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by ChiffonBreath Click here to enlarge
    No. The Bill of Rights and Amendments give us
    rights.
    Err... The Bill of Rights IS the first ten Amendments.

    And all the Amendments are part of the Constitution.

    Just a little civics review here... Click here to enlarge


    The strict Constitutionalists want to take all of our rights away..right's that were hard fought for...plenty of blood shed to prove it.

    I believe that's strict constructionists...
    We Ain't Seen Nothin' Yet

  8. #8
    Democratic Warrior ChiffonBreath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    2,055
    Thanks
    781
    Thanked 600 Times in 430 Posts

    Re: Question

    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by martsmart Click here to enlarge
    Err... The Bill of Rights IS the first ten Amendments.

    And all the Amendments are part of the Constitution.

    Just a little civics review here... Click here to enlarge




    I believe that's strict constructionists...
    I need all the help I can get to not sound like an ass. Click here to enlarge when it comes to the technical stuff res the Constitution...

    I listen..I know...but then it comes out all 2nd grader. If you can help me to get to 3rd grade...heheehe, you will be doing a public service
    Click here to enlarge

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •