+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Petraeus: Al Qaeda No Longer Operating in Afghanistan

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Administrator BigJerr will become famous soon enough BigJerr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    9,816
    Thanks
    128
    Thanked 694 Times in 450 Posts

    Petraeus: Al Qaeda No Longer Operating in Afghanistan

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009...g-afghanistan/

    Consider the source but even a broken is right twice a day.

    The head of U.S. Central Command said Sunday that Al Qaeda is no longer operating in Afghanistan, with its senior leadership having moved to the western region of Pakistan.

    Gen. David Petraeus said affiliated groups have "enclaves and sanctuaries" in Afghanistan and that "tentacles of Al Qaeda" have touched countries throughout the Middle East and northern Africa. But he said the terrorist group has suffered" very significant losses" in recent months, and agreed with Afghan President Hamid Karzai's recent assessment that there is no Al Qaeda based in his country.

    Still, he said he believes Usama bin Laden and his No. 2 Ayman al-Zawahiri remain in charge of the terrorist network.

    "They surface periodically. We see communications that they send out," Petraeus said.

    Though Petraeus said nobody can provide an accurate location for either terrorist, he said Al Qaeda senior leadership clearly is now rooted in the border region of western Pakistan.

    "There's no question that Al Qaeda's senior leadership has been there and has been in operation for years," Petraeus said.

    The head of U.S. Central Command, speaking on "FOX News Sunday," warned of the severe threat extremist groups now pose to Pakistan but praised the U.S. ally for what he described as a coordinated campaign to beat back an uprising of Taliban forces.

    He said that the Taliban's effort to extend their territory beyond the northern Swat valley seems to have "galvanized all of Pakistan" against the group.

    "There is a degree of unanimity that there must be swift and effective action taken against the Taliban in Pakistan," Petraeus said, warning of the dire consequences of a Pakistan defeat.

    "This is not a U.S. fight that Pakistan is carrying out at this point ... This is a Pakistani fight, a Pakistani battle, with elements that as we've mentioned threaten the very existence of the Pakistani state."

    Petraeus spoke Sunday on "FOX News Sunday" and CNN's "State of the Union."
    Bookmark and Share
    "Do not think that I came to bring peace on earth. I did not come to bring peace but a sword. For I have come to set a man against his father, a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law; and a man’s enemies will be those of his own household."

    Matthew 10:34 - 10:36

  2. #2
    Club Fighter claypigeonb is on a distinguished road claypigeonb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    336
    Thanks
    28
    Thanked 117 Times in 65 Posts

    Re: Petraeus: Al Qaeda No Longer Operating in Afghanistan

    Explain it to me again. Just why is it that we have decided that we must eradicate the Taliban? (And don't tell me that stuff about how they violate women's rights. If we were trying to destroy the Taliban over women's rights, then we should have sent troops to Egypt and Saudi Arabia at the same time we sent them to Afghanistan.) Harboring terrorists? Seems to me that for the past eight years or so, we have been doing more of that than any other nation on earth. So, isn't it a little "pot and kettle" to be beating up on people for "harboring terrorists?" Or is it still about that pipeline thing? What is the status of that? Or, is it that U.S. needs the poppy money to finance covert operations? Wouldn't be the first time, would it?
    Bookmark and Share
    "These are the times that try men's souls." - Thomas Paine

  3. #3
    Banned Cannonball is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    352
    Thanks
    28
    Thanked 69 Times in 43 Posts

    Re: Petraeus: Al Qaeda No Longer Operating in Afghanistan

    Quote Originally Posted by claypigeonb View Post
    Explain it to me again. Just why is it that we have decided that we must eradicate the Taliban? (And don't tell me that stuff about how they violate women's rights. If we were trying to destroy the Taliban over women's rights, then we should have sent troops to Egypt and Saudi Arabia at the same time we sent them to Afghanistan.) Harboring terrorists? Seems to me that for the past eight years or so, we have been doing more of that than any other nation on earth. So, isn't it a little "pot and kettle" to be beating up on people for "harboring terrorists?" Or is it still about that pipeline thing? What is the status of that? Or, is it that U.S. needs the poppy money to finance covert operations? Wouldn't be the first time, would it?
    you are exactly right, the fictitious war just keeps on going for the same fictitious reasons.there is no change the agenda is the same.
    Bookmark and Share
    DemocraticWarrior is not a registered Political Action Committee, nor is it a registered Non-Profit Organization. Donations to DemocraticWarrior are not tax-deductible for federal income tax purposes.

  4. #4
    DemocraticWarrior Battle Lord Icky will become famous soon enough Icky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    On Cloud Nine!
    Posts
    21,085
    Thanks
    3,178
    Thanked 3,561 Times in 2,183 Posts

    Re: Petraeus: Al Qaeda No Longer Operating in Afghanistan

    It's Eurasia, right? Or is it EastAsia?

    I get confused nowadays....
    Bookmark and Share
    The only difference between a tax man and a taxidermist is that the taxidermist leaves the skin.
    Mark Twain








    The pessimist says, "Everything is horrible. Things could not possibly get worse!"
    The optimist replies, "Oh yes, it can!"

+ Reply to Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts