Our Strategy for The Next Two Years.

[Ben Burch]

OK, warriors; The White Rose Think Tank (me!) has come up with a winning strategy for the next two years; Tie Bush to every GOP politician like the Albatross in "The Rhyme of The Ancient Mariner".

Examples;

"Minority Whip Trent Lott" becomes "Bush Crony, Minority Whip Trent Lott"

"GOP Presidential Candidate Rudolph Guliani" becomes "Bush Advisor, GOP Presidential Candidate Rudolph Guliani"

Tag phrases to use;

Bush Crony...
Bush Friend...
Bush Advisor...
Bush Ally...
Bush Operative...
Bush Mouthpiece...
Bush Supporter...

Use them every time you refer to ANY GOP POLITICIAN. Never fail to use these tags and we will destroy the GOP in '08 without any doubt in my mind. And do not let the facts get in the way of using these tags. Even if a GOP politician has distanced himself from Bush, he didn't leave the Party for the Libertarians, did he? The only one I would be inclined to cut any slack might be Ron Paul of Texas, who is a Libertarian in GOPer's clothing. Nah, on second though tag Ron too, unless he relabels himself Libertarian.

[FuzzySlippers]

Ben Burch, our answer to Frank Luntz!

:clapping::clapping::clapping:

[Crazy Guggenheim]

:party0007[1]: :party0007[1]:

[lil]

I will do this however I would like to add it is not just the term use that would be effective. It is going to be about the presentation.

[101Scout]

OK, warriors; The White Rose Think Tank (me!) has come up with a winning strategy for the next two years; Tie Bush to every GOP politician like the Albatross in "The Rhyme of The Ancient Mariner".

Examples;

Tag phrases to use;

Bush Crony...
Bush Friend...
Bush Advisor...
Bush Ally...
Bush Operative...
Bush Mouthpiece...
Bush Supporter...

Use them every time you refer to ANY GOP POLITICIAN. Never fail to use these tags and we will destroy the GOP in '08 without any doubt in my mind. And do not let the facts get in the way of using these tags. Even if a GOP politician has distanced himself from Bush, he didn't leave the Party for the Libertarians, did he? The only one I would be inclined to cut any slack might be Ron Paul of Texas, who is a Libertarian in GOPer's clothing. Nah, on second though tag Ron too, unless he relabels himself Libertarian.

In a sense I had always done something like this, but using the term or tag BushCo more than just 'Bush'. That ended up drawing a lot of fire from hidden conservatives in many forums who start raising hell bitchin about why we all "bash' Bush too much. Does that sound familiar to you all? Then we'd get raspberries about how it's not ALL Bush's fault... that other's do it too... Bush's advisors... or even the Dems.... blah blah blah. Then I started using NeoCons in place of BushCo.... that too pissed folks off cause it really touched closer to home with who 'they' truly are. Today, I use the term BushCons more now in place of NeoCons.

BushCons to me represent this damn newer age Republican GOP base that is a mixed bag of NeoCons.... all parties concerned. Those who support Bush's stupid policies and takes turns voting along with the radial GOP bastards in Congress.

See Ben, my real problem now is identifying this mixed bag of NeoCons who cross party borders more than we even realize today. This past '06 election brought this out much more than ever before. I heard conservative voters speak in line with Liberal views more than ever before, and while at the same time, many Dems that got voted in had centrist/moderate conservative views that helped them to picked up a lot of Republican votes. Does anyone else here see the same confusing transformation that our political parties are creating? I sure the hell do.

So for me, those who really have and do support Bush's policy for war and the PNAC crusade in the ME/ C Asia..... I simply consider as BushCons. IMHO, those who still think that price gouging/inflated capitalism is a good thing are nothing but BushCon material. That overkill material thing 'Bush' mentailty.

:door:

This is a good thread to keep alive because it is going to be all about 'strategy' for '08 and God forbid the shape of things to come for '12. I now view Congress and the coming 'new' administration in a much different light now unlike how I viewed things in '00 and even '04. '04 was a serious election to secure for our side, but it was stolen. Now, in '08, this nation will be faced with a huge bankrupting economic / deficit monster while sinking deeper into wars. '08 can not take on any lip service cream puff for a prez!!! The new prez will need to be a hard nosed fighter, yet one who will save this country and it's ecomony while at the same time backing true justice and accountability!!! Circumstances surrounding this coming '08 electon will be much worse than what conditions were in the '68 or '72 election.

So with that all in mind.... when chosing a prez, will it be wrong for us to demand any candidate's stance on these damn presidential pardons AND if he or she will pursue justice against the previous criminals in office???????

[Aslan]

Will do.

[Zemo]

Sounds like we might need a good defoliant to get rid of all the Bushes...lol.

[Ben Burch]

Sounds like we might need a good defoliant to get rid of all the Bushes...lol.

Agent Orange works wonders. Ask any surviving NVA soldier.

[zatoichi1]

There is so much substance that everyone who supported Bush in any way shape or form should get dinged. The more dinged the better.

A voter. Static, but essentially a pass.

An operative. Noting that he/she/it (Ann Coulter we are looking at you for "it") supported war criminals and should be indicted (and probably convicted) as being a co-conspirator.

A politician. Defeat.

An administration dog. Unemployment. They need to get a real job.

Bush. War crimes trial at the Hague.