PDA

View Full Version : BYU's 'Conspiracy' Professor Getting New Support



Koyaanisqatsi
09-15-2006, 06:34 PM
Thanks again to 911blogger.com where I found this update on Steven Jones.

Okay, I have two problems with this piece. Not only does the reporter neglect to mention that the government's official story is ALSO a "conspiracy theory", but he is actually incorrect in claiming Professor Jones actually has a completed conspiracy theory. He is only claiming it appears the government could have been involved and wants a further independent investigation in order to find out IF it was and just exactly how. In other words, Professor Jones has always been all about showing the need for an open honest independent investigation into 9/11 since we haven't had one yet. ;)

Also, the last paragraph about Popular Mechanics claiming it can debunk any conspiracy theory. :rofl: Apparently not dude! You haven't yet! But you just go ahead and keep trying little fella. :rofl:

--------------------

[Only registered and activated users can see links]

(KUTV) SALT LAKE CITY - It’s a local story – with ties to September 11th – that won’t go away.

Now, a BYU professor who believes a conspiracy was involved in the terror attacks on America is getting support from fellow scholars.

Physicist Steven Jones was put on administrative leave last week, because BYU officials were worried that his conspiracy beliefs are tarnishing the university’s image. The school also expressed concern over his research methods.

Jones believes that the hijacked airliners that crashed into the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001 were not enough to topple the towers by themselves. He says the resulting fire simply did not burn hot enough to cause the structural damage necessary for the buildings to collapse.

Many have criticized Jones for his theory, but now an academic group is stepping forward to offer support.

A local chapter of the American Association of University Professors is criticizing BYU for its actions, saying that it restricts academic expression of thought.

“The way that our institutions are supposed to work is, to raise questions,” said AAUP local founder Larry Anderson. “Let everybody else attack if they must.”

“This will help the information about his case get out to other people who are interested in academic freedom,” he added.

In response, BYU issued a statement saying that it “did not make its decision based on external pressure.”

Jones’ conspiracy theory is still generating some interest on the internet, among both supporters and critics – including Popular Mechanics, which says it can discredit any conspiracy theory.

CD3
09-15-2006, 07:07 PM
Considering he's at Mormon University I'm suprised he didn't get the boot sooner.

Koyaanisqatsi
09-15-2006, 08:17 PM
Considering he's at Mormon University I'm suprised he didn't get the boot sooner.

Oddly enough, the University wasn't really upset about Professor Jones' work until just very recently when they did this about-face. They would still be permitting him to use their web address for his now-famous paper "Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Completely Collapse?", but he chose to move the paper very recently to the 911 Scholars for Truth web site here:

[Only registered and activated users can see links]

Mr.Dude
09-18-2006, 06:18 PM
Thanks again to 911blogger.com where I found this update on Steven Jones.

Okay, I have two problems with this piece. Not only does the reporter neglect to mention that the government's official story is ALSO a "conspiracy theory", but he is actually incorrect in claiming Professor Jones actually has a completed conspiracy theory. He is only claiming it appears the government could have been involved and wants a further independent investigation in order to find out IF it was and just exactly how. In other words, Professor Jones has always been all about showing the need for an open honest independent investigation into 9/11 since we haven't had one yet.

Also, the last paragraph about Popular Mechanics claiming it can debunk any conspiracy theory. Apparently not dude! You haven't yet! But you just go ahead and keep trying little fella.
[Only registered and activated users can see links]
(KUTV) SALT LAKE CITY - It’s a local story – with ties to September 11th – that won’t go away.

People don't want the truth. They want to believe what they want to believe.

Professor Stephen E. Jones is a Professor of "Metal-catalyzed Fusion," better known as "Cold Fusion." This area of physics is not based on any aspect of performance testing of materials used in or of tall buildings.

Popular Mechanics used the findings of:
Forman Williams, a Professor of Engineering at UC San Diego.
Farid Alfawakhiri: Senior Engineer of Construction Codes and Standards at the Iron an Steel Institute, an industry group.
Jon Magnusson: of Magnusson Klemenic Associates of Seattle, Washington, an engineering firm, for whom John Skilling, one of the two original engineers of the World Trade Center, was an original founder.
Alan Pense: Professor Emeritus of Metallurgical Engineering at Leihigh University.
Richard Fruehan: Professor of Mettalurgical Engineering at Carnegie Mellon University.
Mark Loizeaux: President of Controlled Demolition, Inc., the premier firm in controlled implosions.
Zdenek Bazant: Northwestern University, One of only 14 people ever awarded the Prager Medal for Outstanding contributions to theoretical or practical solid mechanics.
Matthys Levy: Structural Engineer, author of "Why Buildings Fall Down: How Structures Fail."
by way of rebuttal.

The rebutters are all experts in their given fields. All the fields of expertize of the rebutters are directly associated with high rises and steel structure engineering.

It is important to understand my real point, so I'm going to state it very plainly. I don't want to upset anybody. But you must understand what's really going on:

The truth is people are being deceived on purpose. Here you have all these experts who state conclusively that the WTC towers fell and they give detailed reasons why this must be so.
Yet people refuse to believe the experts and prefer to believe someone else, who is less versed in the topic than an expert. People need to see that they are being manipulated. It's not their fault.
Consider the following: You are told two things by two separate people. One says A, the other says B. Both claim they are right. How are you to distinguish the truth from anything else? If you do not have any specific understanding of A and B, how are you to determine the truth? You need to understand that you own personal ideas begin to influence your ability to perceive the truth. And if your ideas are established by people who do not want you to find the truth, you have surrendered your freedom to people who intentions may not in your best interests.