Conyers to Gonzales: No,

[lil]

As much as Attorney General Alberto Gonzales wanted to change the subject from the attorney scandal, House Committee Chair John Conyers kept the heat on.........
[Only registered and activated users can see links]

[101Scout]

I saw that on C-Span last night Rebel Lady. It was choice. Then Maxine Waters really roughed Al up! It was without mercy!! She was 10x tougher than Conyers on him.Then there was the Dem from Fla who absolutely bitch slapped Gonzo from wall to wall. I have to admit this about Gonzo tho... he absorbes beaucoup punches!! Bushie will love him for it. gonzo is his personalized robot.

:_smack_:

[USA#1]

Looks like there are other measures that can deal with Tortuella.

[Only registered and activated users can see links]

Could Alberto Gonzales be disbarred?:woohoo:


“While the political world obsesses over whether Attorney General Alberto Gonzales can survive the outcry over the politically motivated dismissal of eight United States Attorneys, the legal academy has been debating a different aspect of the fallout: Could a case be made that the chief law-enforcement officer of the United States should be disbarred? ([Only registered and activated users can see links];3A%2F%2F[Only registered and activated users can see links])”
The question has emerged in the wake of what many consider to be damaging testimony by Monica Goodling, Mr. Gonzales’ senior counselor and the Justice Department’s White House liaison, before the House Judiciary Committee on May 23.



Ms. Goodling described a meeting in March where Mr. Gonzales said to her: “Let me tell you what I can remember,” and “laid out his general recollection” that the firings of the prosecutors had been performance-related. At his own appearance before the Senate Judiciary Committee in April, Mr. Gonzales told the panel that “I haven’t talked to witnesses because of the fact that I haven’t wanted to interfere with this investigation and department investigations.”



“It depends crucially on what the facts are,” said David Luban, a professor at the Georgetown University Law Center. “Given the most unfavorable interpretation, there’s clearly a case for disbarment.”